Translate

Showing posts with label truth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label truth. Show all posts

Sunday, July 18, 2021

Renunciation of Truth - How Long Can We Survive a Reality Based on Falsehoods?

Truth is the acknowledgment of reality, the recognition of the way things exist. At the bottom of the truth issue, we find the claim of the first law of logic – the law of identity. A=A. A thing is itself and nothing else. Reality is that which exists.

As such, truth has for centuries been a notion at the center of Western tradition. Despite human imperfection, fallibility, and enmity, the value of truth as the reasonable correlation between human judgment and reality has remained vital. Essential fields of human activity such as jurisprudence and science depend on truth and implicitly assume her in their dealings. Beyond these areas, people of good character – in politics, the media, civil society – have persistently appreciated the value of truth. Not least, for the faithful believer, the notion of truth culminates in the Christian proclamation that truth is the path and way of life.

Nevertheless, falsehoods and untruths have perennially been used for personal and political gain and power. Countless examples from all civilizations and political systems – authoritarian, totalitarian, democratic – provide evidence for this claim. And we all know it from personal experience as well.

Therefore, we should not be surprised that all of this is also part of our contemporary times and the ongoing political business. However, no doubt, the distortion of reality and the implanting of unreal ideas in people's consciousness appear to have reached a new and unfortunate peak. Where has the "love for truth" gone? How could, across the polity, have ideological prejudice, the political will to power, personal vanity, and self-importance gained precedence over decency, honesty, fairness, humanness? Do people no longer understand – or perhaps did they never have? – that truthfulness and truth-seeking rest on moral grounds and no human society can survive in the long run without it? Don't they grasp that justice and righteousness and honesty and decency are nothing but the application, the becoming visible of truth, in our social and political lives? I tackled the notion of truth and her moral and intellectual implications in a blog entry called "Truth in Life and Politics" in 2016 (to be found here).

Aside from educational shortcomings that underpin the notion of truth entirely, I will outline two reasons for the amazing and, at the same time, the alarming magnitude of reality distortion we experience in our day and age. One is old as humankind, the second relatively new and utterly pernicious to our civilization. Yet, both conjoin to form the disastrous reality we are confronting now in our daily lives.

First, human malice, evildoing, and wickedness – those timeless traits of human nature – manifest themselves on new planes of magnitude, probably destroying people's lives and livelihoods more than ever before. While human nature has not changed, possibly even gotten vainer and more self-centered, the contemporary means of electronic communication, an abundance of media information, and the presence and use of social media allow for unprecedented levels of manipulation and denigration. 

The four years of Mr. Trump's presidency saw unprecedented delusions created and preserved by corrupt politicians, the big media corporations, and tech giants such as Facebook and Twitter. I have depicted in previous blog essays the evilness of the Democratic Party of the United States, without a doubt the most extreme and destructive political force in the nations of the Western hemisphere in our lifetime. Right on their heels are following the RINOs and anti-Trumpers in the Republican Party. They all make the leftist forces in Europe and Latin America look pale by comparison. I commented on this vile bunch of people repeatedly (for example here).

Let us take as a more recent example the misrepresentation of the January 6 Capitol riots. Not only were the storming hordes unarmed, but it also turns out the FBI orchestrated the whole upheaval to malign Trump supporters and coerce Republican politicians into giving up on the idea of challenging election results. Until today, the identity of the security guard who shot the unarmed protester Ashley Babbitt has not been publicized. A Capitol policeman, as it turned out, allegedly killed by a protester with a fire extinguisher, had died of natural causes, as evidenced by his family. Previously, the Russian collusion of the Trump campaign, pushed by the media for months on end, turned out to be bogus. Yet, during his tenure, when Mr. Trump tried to improve relations with Russia and overcome the yearlong Russophobe stance of major political stakeholders in the U.S., they kept badgering him as a Russian agent.

The same fate of derailment awaited the phony attempts to impeach the 45th President on unfounded charges (my take on the impeachment to be found here). While left-wing Antifa and Black Lives Matter thugs have been burning and looting for months, Democrats want to make us believe that right-wing extremism is the primary threat to the nation. Even traditional Christian values, mind you, run meanwhile under the headline of being extremist on the right. Election Integrity Laws are being denigrated as "voter suppression." Mr. Biden just auctioned himself off to the ridiculous remark that voter suppression is the biggest challenge to the country since the Civil War. This absurdity is regurgitated notwithstanding the irregularities and forensic evidence that surfaced in the wake of the November 2020 elections. While the justified concern that the election almost certainly was stolen from Mr. Trump is disparaged as conspiratorial, doubting voter fraud seems rather the monstrous thing to argue.

The list of lies, distortions, intentional falsehoods, and attempts to suppress the truth could go on almost endlessly. One fact, however, emerged clearly out of the political and social on-goings of the past few years. The bulk of the polity, the media, and the security apparatus have turned into machines of lie-production. They now represent ideologically subverted institutions that shy no unlawful and immoral transgressions to push through the left's progressive agenda.

The second reason standing in the way of truth and acknowledging reality is probably even more dangerous. It pertains to the constant and ever-increasing delusion over existential facts and realities driven by human hubris. I am talking about the unprecedented magnitude of anthropocentrism that dictates our contemporary understanding of what the human species can achieve, which supports the buildup of the fake realities dominating and eventually destroying our lives. No longer, for many, is the decisive task of truth to find out what nature dictates to man – grasping the actual reality in which we live – and what limits she sets for him and how the recognition translates best into meaningful prescriptions for human coexistence. It is now rather about overcoming the boundaries and limitations of natural conditions. Social constructivism is creating bogus realities and an environment of fake authenticity.

Man misunderstands himself as "Creator" and refuses to acknowledge a "natural order" of things. In the attempt to free himself from all social, cultural, religious, and biological conditions, western man strives to create his realities, guided by individual hedonism and personal gratification. Claims for a new "anthropology" aim at new identity designs for individuals and interest groups.  These attempts also create new power structures and radically alter our societies.

Gender-Mainstreaming efforts terminate the natural binary gender code and with it dismiss the exclusivity of traditional marriage. The rare albeit genuine sexual ambiguity some people feel about their sex does not constitute a third (or fourth, or fifth, or umpteenth sex). Sex is binary and primary biologically determined and will remain so despite hormone treatments and sex-change operations. Recent studies have shown that even these interventions cannot change the gender code formed in the individual by creation. But wherever hard science does not fit the ideological agenda, the absurd distortion of reality continues. For example, when we speak no longer of mothers but of "birthing people" and in certificates replace father and mother with parent one and parent two.

Thus, the social ethics of Christendom that reigned for two millennia in acknowledgment of the ontological realities of human existence are now considered a threat and disparaged as extremist. "Anthropotechnical blasphemy" is the term the German philosopher Peter Sloterdijk coined to depict the insanity of what is going on.

The contemporary climate hysteria is another area in which anthropocentrism stands in the way of truth. While nobody doubts climate change as a perennial natural phenomenon, the anthropocentricity of the left overestimates human influence to turn climate change into the defining issue of our time and an existential threat for humanity. With this hysteria generated (known to the older generations from the 1970s and 1980s, i.e., the Club of Rome), politicians can justify massive economic, social, and financial policy interventions. 

Wherever we look, we see inversions of truth transpiring, absurd reality patterns arise.

Today, the convenient self-interpretations of man are supposed to give him his identity. And yet, identity does not stem from wishful thinking. On the contrary, it evolves from a proper recognition of reality and the true nature of things. Identity only belongs to the truth. Once again: "A=A."

As our western societies – particularly here in the U.S. – become ever more divided and at the same time amorphous as standards for right and wrong, good and evil disappear, our culture loses all dignity. Cultural authoritarianism and vulgar relativism spreads like wildfire. 

Yet, equally terrifying is the complacency and contentment of conservative politicians and citizens in the U.S. and the Western world. Instead of carrying out a united backlash against the irresponsible leftist policies that reject law and order and the dictate of nature, conservative forces appear divided and self-contradictory. 

The moral inertia of humankind throughout western civilization is shocking. The ongoing "Cultural Revolution" violates human dignity and the elementary foundations of humanity and natural law. The latter presenting the invisible reality and timeless criteria for ethics and legal regulation as they pertain to human nature universally. 

Those people who have navigated unscathed through the rough sea of postmodern deconstructivism and nihilism, hopefully preserving their moral character and the power of healthy intuition and judgment, ask themselves only one question: How long will our societies survive the realities we build on falsehoods before they break apart?

Thursday, June 2, 2016

Truth in Life and Politics

In the classical theory of knowledge, epistemology, we consider truth to be the correspondence between judgment and reality, between what we think is the case and what really is the case. Finding truth involves perception and reasoning on the judging individual's part and pertains to a moral aspect, namely the human volition to seek the 'truth and nothing but the truth.' Is there a sincere intent to attain truth, or is there a mere desire to mold the perception of reality according to one's values and preconceived notions of politics and social affairs?


Social and political realities are not perceived by a bloodless technocratic entity, but rather by a human being socialized and educated, subject to emotions, and driven by interests and value dispositions. This specification of the human condition must have made Friedrich Nietzsche come up with his famous aphorism: "There are no facts, only perceptions." In other words, only if we cleanse our perceptions from those ingredients that could taint the objective perception and cognition of reality can we attain the facts of life. No human is infallible. And particularly when it comes to judging complex contexts of our existence, this ideal postulation might only remain an approximation. Notwithstanding, all human beings can potentially purge their judgments of truth-hindering additions.  

 

 To become aware of that verity, let alone overcome it, requires a certain level of philosophical erudition and capacity for critical thinking. It necessitates an attitude shaped along with the literal understanding of the term philosopher to be a friend (Philo) of truth/wisdom (Sophia). Not everybody has to be a philosopher, but everybody can avail of a particular philosophical inclination in the sense of being curious for truth and wisdom. 


But where can we still find the attitude of giving precedence to truth and objectivity over pride, prejudice, preconceptions, personal vanities and benefits, individual or group interests? Obstinacy seems to abound in all spheres of life and human interactions. Assertiveness prevails over insight gained from wrong decisions, painful experiences, and errors of judgment. 


To avoid admitting erroneous judgment and thus hurting one's sense of pride, doubling down on premises that have proven wrong and destructive appears to be the business of our time. In our day and age, the dictates of political correctness and affirmative action turn the notions of truth and objective realities into a laughingstock; facts don't count anymore; instead, only false perceptions serving unnatural agendas. In politics and personal lives, cognitive operations appear to satisfy self-absorption and personal gratification primarily. 


I need not mention examples here. The readers can find them in their personal lives and take a blunt look at their social and political environments. The scope of the described phenomenon ranges from gender policies to gun control issues, from the media's general corruption to the individual dishonesty of journalists and pundits, from the rock-bottom perfidiousness of political campaigning to the intellectual and moral decay that is taking place on the campuses.


Who and what is responsible for this deranged approach that seems to dominate so many hearts and minds? 


It owes to the disregard and lack of classical liberal arts instruction, as it has become ubiquitous in almost all fields of education. Only studying the history of ideas and the grand traditions of human thinking can provide for a substantial foundation of human identity. Solely this type of instruction is devoid of the ideological notions of contemporary social and political life. It is getting acquainted with this tradition, on whatever level of intellectual prowess and educational commitment, that instills a sense of morality that resides in the human being's conscience rather than the dictate of external expediency. This type of instruction and the knowledge that comes with it forms autonomous judgmental abilities and reflective competence that strives for objective insight and truthfulness rather than the satisfaction of individual or collective vanities and interests. 


While of significance for every human being, it is of paramount importance for scientists, politicians, physicians, judges, educators, military, and law enforcement personnel; in short, for all those who impact and hold responsibility for human's well-being.

Sunday, April 24, 2016

2016 U.S. Presidential Election and the Future of the West

The future of the United States and the future of the entire Western world are at stake with the U.S. presidential election outcome. The presidency of the incumbent B. Obama has been a sham throughout. A notorious liar (you can keep your doctor; Syrian red line; Russia's aggressions), political dilettante (caused unparalleled domestic and international damage), and incorrigible partisan politician (intolerant left-wing ideologue), he divided the country culturally as it has probably never been the case since the Vietnam War.

Although being a Democrat, he has persecuted a neo-conservative foreign policy of interventionism, supported by Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State and quite a few out-of-their-minds Republican senators and congress members, like John McCain, Lindsay Graham, Marco Rubio. He urged interventions where none were necessary or legitimate, which caused chaos in Libya, Syria, and Iraq, fostered the emergence of ISIS, and further deteriorated relations with Russia and Europe.

At this juncture, toward the end of Obama's tenure, one can predict that Hillary Clinton as president would continue the pernicious path of US-American politics, both domestically and internationally. Her Supreme Court judges' appointments would push American society's cultural decline and moral nihilism further. Indifferent immigration and open borders will advance the dissolution of the proper structure of a healthy nation-state as the only guarantor for sound legal and social policies.  Europe will be brought closer to a military conflict with Russia by advancing the destructive policies of NATO in Eastern Europe and the Baltic States and American power projection into the South China Sea. It is to expect that the overstretch of U.S. foreign policy and the American military forces will continue and drive Russia, China, and Iran closer together to ally against what they rightfully may consider excessive imperialism.

As the White House run unfolded, there was one candidate who gave hope that if he got elected, we could expect an overdue turn-around of U.S. policies; Rand Paul. With his dropping out, only one candidate remains, who, despite his deficits, could ensure us of policies that might save the U.S. and the West if it is not already much too late. This candidate is Donald Trump.

Yet, the moral nihilism that has taken hold in American politics might make his success impossible. The way his opponents and even members of his party treated him was so shameful that one has to ask if the U.S. has already degenerated into a banana republic. The dumbing down of the U.S. and its citizens has dwindled to an alarming low. Driven to accept the ideology of affirmative action and political correctness, neither reality nor truth matter anymore. Despite his first term's dismal record, the American people reelected a half-black guy because of the color of his skin and the fact that he carried a "D" in front of his name. The next president might be elected because of her gender and having a "D" in front of her name.

If that happens, the U.S., as well as the West, will be finished.

Comprehending Putin: The Unconsidered Resolution for the Russia-Ukraine Conflict

The statesmanlike strategist has always been set apart from ordinary ideologues and low-class politicians by his ability to assess an oppone...