Situations of distress, panic, and outright hysteria, allow for deep insights into the human soul – into the essence of an individual character as well as the psyche of cultures and entire civilizations. It discloses moral and intellectual deficiencies and reflects civic arrangements, the political order, and constitutional designs.
It is a sobering spectacle to watch a hedonistic civilization, exhausted and vain after decades of venerating money and material pleasures when faced with a potentially deadly virus pandemic, now consumed by trivial regard for physical survival. Almost all politicians, medical and other experts surrounding the US President and leaders in most European countries focus exclusively on survivability rates and protecting everybody at all costs. Those nations and leaders that appear to keep their societal environments open (i.e., Sweden) rectify it by referencing liberal values and the right to self-determination of citizens. Any more profound sense of understanding of why the near-total shutdown of our societies and the ubiquitous succumbing to the corona virus is highly problematic, to say the least, is missing.
Interesting to note, though, that the much-hated President Trump, while not expressing it philosophically, in his intuitive wisdom, questions the maxim upon which the majority acts. While they want to save lives and resent opening up the country with all their might, Trump clarifies that the cure must not be worse than the disease.
In expressing what sounds like a banal truism, he reveals philosophical wisdom, which is this: “If any collective of people set the value of personal physical survival absolute, they’ve declared moral bankruptcy and are on the path to perishment.” Indeed, we have to be willing to put our lives on the line and enter a trade-off between physical survival and maintaining our social and economic livelihoods. Undeniably, Trump understood what most don’t even dare to think.
Frank Dietrich, a fellow philosopher from the University of Düsseldorf, nailed it this way (my translation): “If the crisis continues for a long time and the economic turmoil reaches extreme proportions, we must reconsider the primacy of saving lives.”
In other words, the young and healthy, those up to retirement age whose health is not compromised by medical preconditions, have to get back to work and keep the countries and nations going. Some might fall ill, a few might even die, but we must not hide away until the last trace of the corona virus has disappeared, a vaccine came out, and nobody can get sick anymore.
Our societies have to ‘man’ up again, and we should remind ourselves of Plato’s ‘thymos,’ the ‘spiritedness,’ this ingredient of the human soul without which neither an individual nor society can survive in the long run. If we are no longer willing to risk our lives for each other, we are virtually enslaving ourselves, and we will eventually – when looking back – be ashamed of our cowardice.
It is important not to confuse or misinterpret the outlined axiom. Of course, everything meaningful to preserve lives, and every measure to protect people, must be welcome. However, the preservation of life and physical survivability must not develop into an absolute.
If not for anything, we should at least seize the opportunity this crisis offers to rediscover the dignity that human existence is more than self-preservation at all costs and fear of death. Ultimately, every one of us – above all, our political leaders and representatives – will be judged against this backdrop of self-respect and esteem.
It is time to crawl out from underneath our shelters and sanctuaries and face life again.